Cline vs Continue in 2026: VS Code AI Extensions Compared (Features, Pricing, Use Cases)

Cline is an autonomous coding agent with Plan/Act modes and 5M+ installs. Continue pivoted to CI-enforceable code checks. Real feature comparison with pricing and use cases.

February 27, 2026 · 1 min read

Summary

Quick Answer (Feb 2026)

  • Choose Cline if: You want an autonomous AI coding agent inside VS Code that writes code, runs commands, and manages files with Plan/Act modes
  • Choose Continue if: You want automated, source-controlled code checks that run on every PR as GitHub status checks
  • Use both if: You want Cline for writing code and Continue's CLI for enforcing team standards on PRs
5M+
Cline installs across platforms
58K+
Cline GitHub stars
CI-first
Continue's 2026 focus

These two tools started as similar VS Code AI extensions but have diverged sharply. Cline doubled down on autonomous coding. Continue pivoted to CI enforcement. Choosing between them is straightforward once you understand what each does now.

What Each Tool Does in February 2026

Cline: Autonomous Coding Agent

An open-source VS Code extension with 5M+ installs. Reads your codebase, writes and edits files, runs terminal commands, automates browsers, and integrates MCP tools. Plan mode strategizes; Act mode executes. Ships with a CLI for headless CI/CD. Supports any LLM via BYOK.

Continue: CI Code Enforcement

Pivoted from IDE extension to CLI-first platform. Source-controlled AI checks live as markdown files in .continue/checks/ and run on every PR as GitHub status checks. Integrates with Sentry, Snyk, and CI/CD pipelines. The VS Code/JetBrains extensions still work for chat and agent mode.

The Pivot

In mid-2025, Continue's team moved from IDE extensions to what they call "Continuous AI" - a CLI approach for automated code enforcement on pull requests. Each check is a version-controlled, reviewable markdown file owned by your team. This is a fundamentally different product than what Continue was in 2024.

Feature Comparison

FeatureClineContinue
Primary functionAutonomous coding agent in IDESource-controlled PR code checks
IDE supportVS Code onlyVS Code + JetBrains (extension), CLI anywhere
Agent modePlan/Act dual modes with human approvalAgent mode in IDE extension + async PR agents
File editingDirect file create/edit/deleteVia IDE extension agent mode
Terminal commandsFull terminal access with approvalCLI runs in CI pipelines
Browser automationBuilt-in browser controlNot available
MCP integrationFull marketplace with 100+ serversNot a focus
CI/CD integrationCLI for headless modeCore product: PR status checks
Code reviewNot built-inAsync agents on every PR
Model supportAny LLM via BYOK (20+ providers)Any model via configuration
Open sourceYes (Apache-2.0)Yes (Apache-2.0)
Self-hostingBYOK, runs locallyCLI + HuggingFace, vLLM, Ollama

Autonomous Coding: Where Cline Pulls Ahead

Cline's Plan and Act modes are its defining feature. Plan mode separates strategy from execution: the AI analyzes requirements, reads the codebase, and builds a step-by-step implementation plan without modifying anything. Act mode then executes that plan, editing files and running commands with human approval at each step.

Cline Plan/Act Workflow

# In VS Code, Cline sidebar:
# 1. Switch to Plan mode
# → AI reads codebase, identifies relevant files
# → Proposes implementation strategy
# → No files modified yet

# 2. Review and approve the plan

# 3. Switch to Act mode
# → AI executes step by step
# → Each file edit requires your approval
# → Terminal commands require your approval
# → Checkpoints let you roll back any step

Continue's IDE extension has an agent mode, but it is not the company's focus. The agent can handle multi-file refactoring and respond to natural language instructions, but Cline's depth of autonomous capability (browser automation, MCP tools, checkpoints, per-task cost tracking) is substantially greater.

Cline: Checkpoints

Snapshot and restore your workspace at each step. If the agent goes off-track, roll back to any previous state. Every step has a cost tracker showing tokens used.

Cline: MCP Marketplace

100+ pre-built MCP servers act as a plugin ecosystem. Add database access, API integrations, browser control, and custom tools with a single click from the marketplace.

Cline: Browser Automation

Built-in browser control for testing web apps, reading documentation, and debugging UI issues. Supports remote browser instances for server environments and Docker containers.

IDE Extension vs CI/CD Platform

The most important distinction: Cline helps you write code. Continue helps you enforce standards on code that has already been written.

AspectCline (IDE-first)Continue (CI-first)
When it runsWhile you code, on demandOn every PR, automated
Who triggers itDeveloper in IDEGit push / PR creation
OutputCode changes, terminal outputGitHub status checks, suggestions
Configuration.clinerules files, MCP config.continue/checks/ markdown files
Team enforcementPer-developer, opt-inEnforced on all PRs
IntegrationsMCP servers, API providersGitHub, Sentry, Snyk, CI/CD

Continue: Source-Controlled AI Check

# .continue/checks/security-review.md
---
name: Security Review
model: claude-sonnet-4.6
---

Review this PR for security issues:
- SQL injection vulnerabilities
- Exposed secrets or API keys
- Missing input validation
- Insecure deserialization

# This file lives in your repo, version-controlled,
# and runs automatically on every PR as a GitHub status check.

Model Support and Flexibility

Both tools are model-agnostic, but Cline offers broader provider support out of the box.

ProviderClineContinue
Anthropic (Claude)Yes (native)Yes
OpenAI (GPT)YesYes
Google (Gemini)YesYes
OpenRouterYes (native)Via config
AWS BedrockYesYes
Azure OpenAIYesYes
Local models (Ollama)YesYes
LM StudioYesVia OpenAI-compatible API
Cerebras / GroqYes (native)Via config
Separate plan/act modelsYes (different model per mode)N/A (single model per check)

Cline's standout model feature: you can use a different model for Plan mode vs Act mode. Use a reasoning-heavy model (Claude Opus, o3) for planning and a faster, cheaper model (Sonnet, GPT-4o) for execution. This optimizes both quality and cost.

Pricing Comparison

TierClineContinue
Free tierExtension free forever, BYOKSolo: $0/dev/month (Hub)
TeamsFree through Q1 2026, then $20/mo (first 10 seats free)Team: $10/dev/month (Hub + config)
EnterpriseCustom (SSO, OIDC, audit logs, VPC)Custom (governance, priority support)
Model costsDirect from provider (BYOK)Direct from provider or Hub Models Add-On
What you pay forTeam features + API tokensHub governance + API tokens

Cost Reality

Both tools are free at the core. The extension and CLI are open-source. You pay your LLM provider for API calls. The paid tiers add team management, centralized configuration, and enterprise compliance features. For solo developers, both are effectively free plus API costs.

Decision Framework: When to Use Each

Your NeedUse ThisWhy
AI writes code for meClineFull autonomous agent with Plan/Act, file editing, terminal access
Enforce coding standards on PRsContinueSource-controlled checks as GitHub status checks on every PR
AI autocomplete in editorNeither (use Copilot, Cursor, or Supermaven)Both tools focus on agentic work, not inline completions
Autonomous multi-file changesClinePlan/Act modes with checkpoints and rollback
Browser testing and automationClineBuilt-in browser control, remote browser support
Team-wide code quality gatesContinueMarkdown-defined checks enforced in CI
JetBrains IDE supportContinueCline is VS Code only; Continue supports both
MCP tool ecosystemCline100+ MCP servers in marketplace
Privacy / local modelsEitherBoth support Ollama, self-hosted models, and local execution

Using Cline and Continue Together

Since these tools now serve different purposes, they pair well. Cline handles the coding. Continue enforces quality after the code is pushed.

Combined Workflow

# Step 1: Use Cline to write code
# In VS Code, ask Cline to implement a feature
# Plan mode → review strategy → Act mode → code written

# Step 2: Push to GitHub
git push origin feature/new-auth

# Step 3: Continue runs automatically on the PR
# .continue/checks/security-review.md → GitHub status check
# .continue/checks/style-guide.md → GitHub status check
# .continue/checks/test-coverage.md → GitHub status check

# Result: Cline's code gets reviewed by Continue's AI checks
# Both tools are open-source. Both use your own API keys.

This workflow gives you the best of both: autonomous coding speed from Cline, plus automated quality enforcement from Continue. Neither tool conflicts with the other because they operate at different stages of the development lifecycle.

For a broader look at AI coding options, see our guides on Cursor alternatives, GitHub Copilot alternatives, and Cline vs Cursor.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Cline or Continue better for AI coding in 2026?

For AI-assisted coding in your editor, Cline is the better choice. It's an autonomous coding agent with Plan/Act modes, browser automation, MCP integration, and 5M+ installs. Continue pivoted to a CI-first code enforcement platform. The IDE extension still works, but Continue's core product is now automated PR checks.

Is Cline free?

The VS Code extension is free and open-source. You bring your own API key and pay the model provider directly. Cline's team features (Open Source Teams) are free through Q1 2026, then $20/month with the first 10 seats always free. Enterprise pricing is custom.

What happened to Continue.dev?

Continue pivoted in mid-2025 from an IDE autocomplete/chat extension to a CLI-first platform for source-controlled AI code checks. Each check is a markdown file in .continue/checks/ that runs as a GitHub status check on PRs. The VS Code and JetBrains extensions still exist, but the company's focus shifted to CI/CD enforcement.

Can I use Cline and Continue together?

Yes. They complement each other well since they serve different purposes. Use Cline for autonomous coding in your editor. Use Continue's CLI to enforce team standards on every PR. Cline writes the code; Continue checks it.

Does Continue still work as a VS Code extension?

Yes. Continue's VS Code and JetBrains extensions still offer autocomplete, chat, and agent mode. But the company's primary product is now the Continue CLI for CI-enforceable code checks. The IDE extension receives less investment than the CLI product since mid-2025.

Better Code Search for Any AI Coding Agent

WarpGrep is an agentic code search tool that improves any AI coding agent's performance. It works as an MCP server inside Cline, Claude Code, Cursor, and any tool that supports MCP. Better search means better context means better code.

Sources