Summary
Quick Answer (Feb 2026)
- Choose Cline if: You want an autonomous AI coding agent inside VS Code that writes code, runs commands, and manages files with Plan/Act modes
- Choose Continue if: You want automated, source-controlled code checks that run on every PR as GitHub status checks
- Use both if: You want Cline for writing code and Continue's CLI for enforcing team standards on PRs
These two tools started as similar VS Code AI extensions but have diverged sharply. Cline doubled down on autonomous coding. Continue pivoted to CI enforcement. Choosing between them is straightforward once you understand what each does now.
What Each Tool Does in February 2026
Cline: Autonomous Coding Agent
An open-source VS Code extension with 5M+ installs. Reads your codebase, writes and edits files, runs terminal commands, automates browsers, and integrates MCP tools. Plan mode strategizes; Act mode executes. Ships with a CLI for headless CI/CD. Supports any LLM via BYOK.
Continue: CI Code Enforcement
Pivoted from IDE extension to CLI-first platform. Source-controlled AI checks live as markdown files in .continue/checks/ and run on every PR as GitHub status checks. Integrates with Sentry, Snyk, and CI/CD pipelines. The VS Code/JetBrains extensions still work for chat and agent mode.
The Pivot
In mid-2025, Continue's team moved from IDE extensions to what they call "Continuous AI" - a CLI approach for automated code enforcement on pull requests. Each check is a version-controlled, reviewable markdown file owned by your team. This is a fundamentally different product than what Continue was in 2024.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Cline | Continue |
|---|---|---|
| Primary function | Autonomous coding agent in IDE | Source-controlled PR code checks |
| IDE support | VS Code only | VS Code + JetBrains (extension), CLI anywhere |
| Agent mode | Plan/Act dual modes with human approval | Agent mode in IDE extension + async PR agents |
| File editing | Direct file create/edit/delete | Via IDE extension agent mode |
| Terminal commands | Full terminal access with approval | CLI runs in CI pipelines |
| Browser automation | Built-in browser control | Not available |
| MCP integration | Full marketplace with 100+ servers | Not a focus |
| CI/CD integration | CLI for headless mode | Core product: PR status checks |
| Code review | Not built-in | Async agents on every PR |
| Model support | Any LLM via BYOK (20+ providers) | Any model via configuration |
| Open source | Yes (Apache-2.0) | Yes (Apache-2.0) |
| Self-hosting | BYOK, runs locally | CLI + HuggingFace, vLLM, Ollama |
Autonomous Coding: Where Cline Pulls Ahead
Cline's Plan and Act modes are its defining feature. Plan mode separates strategy from execution: the AI analyzes requirements, reads the codebase, and builds a step-by-step implementation plan without modifying anything. Act mode then executes that plan, editing files and running commands with human approval at each step.
Cline Plan/Act Workflow
# In VS Code, Cline sidebar:
# 1. Switch to Plan mode
# → AI reads codebase, identifies relevant files
# → Proposes implementation strategy
# → No files modified yet
# 2. Review and approve the plan
# 3. Switch to Act mode
# → AI executes step by step
# → Each file edit requires your approval
# → Terminal commands require your approval
# → Checkpoints let you roll back any stepContinue's IDE extension has an agent mode, but it is not the company's focus. The agent can handle multi-file refactoring and respond to natural language instructions, but Cline's depth of autonomous capability (browser automation, MCP tools, checkpoints, per-task cost tracking) is substantially greater.
Cline: Checkpoints
Snapshot and restore your workspace at each step. If the agent goes off-track, roll back to any previous state. Every step has a cost tracker showing tokens used.
Cline: MCP Marketplace
100+ pre-built MCP servers act as a plugin ecosystem. Add database access, API integrations, browser control, and custom tools with a single click from the marketplace.
Cline: Browser Automation
Built-in browser control for testing web apps, reading documentation, and debugging UI issues. Supports remote browser instances for server environments and Docker containers.
IDE Extension vs CI/CD Platform
The most important distinction: Cline helps you write code. Continue helps you enforce standards on code that has already been written.
| Aspect | Cline (IDE-first) | Continue (CI-first) |
|---|---|---|
| When it runs | While you code, on demand | On every PR, automated |
| Who triggers it | Developer in IDE | Git push / PR creation |
| Output | Code changes, terminal output | GitHub status checks, suggestions |
| Configuration | .clinerules files, MCP config | .continue/checks/ markdown files |
| Team enforcement | Per-developer, opt-in | Enforced on all PRs |
| Integrations | MCP servers, API providers | GitHub, Sentry, Snyk, CI/CD |
Continue: Source-Controlled AI Check
# .continue/checks/security-review.md
---
name: Security Review
model: claude-sonnet-4.6
---
Review this PR for security issues:
- SQL injection vulnerabilities
- Exposed secrets or API keys
- Missing input validation
- Insecure deserialization
# This file lives in your repo, version-controlled,
# and runs automatically on every PR as a GitHub status check.Model Support and Flexibility
Both tools are model-agnostic, but Cline offers broader provider support out of the box.
| Provider | Cline | Continue |
|---|---|---|
| Anthropic (Claude) | Yes (native) | Yes |
| OpenAI (GPT) | Yes | Yes |
| Google (Gemini) | Yes | Yes |
| OpenRouter | Yes (native) | Via config |
| AWS Bedrock | Yes | Yes |
| Azure OpenAI | Yes | Yes |
| Local models (Ollama) | Yes | Yes |
| LM Studio | Yes | Via OpenAI-compatible API |
| Cerebras / Groq | Yes (native) | Via config |
| Separate plan/act models | Yes (different model per mode) | N/A (single model per check) |
Cline's standout model feature: you can use a different model for Plan mode vs Act mode. Use a reasoning-heavy model (Claude Opus, o3) for planning and a faster, cheaper model (Sonnet, GPT-4o) for execution. This optimizes both quality and cost.
Pricing Comparison
| Tier | Cline | Continue |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | Extension free forever, BYOK | Solo: $0/dev/month (Hub) |
| Teams | Free through Q1 2026, then $20/mo (first 10 seats free) | Team: $10/dev/month (Hub + config) |
| Enterprise | Custom (SSO, OIDC, audit logs, VPC) | Custom (governance, priority support) |
| Model costs | Direct from provider (BYOK) | Direct from provider or Hub Models Add-On |
| What you pay for | Team features + API tokens | Hub governance + API tokens |
Cost Reality
Both tools are free at the core. The extension and CLI are open-source. You pay your LLM provider for API calls. The paid tiers add team management, centralized configuration, and enterprise compliance features. For solo developers, both are effectively free plus API costs.
Decision Framework: When to Use Each
| Your Need | Use This | Why |
|---|---|---|
| AI writes code for me | Cline | Full autonomous agent with Plan/Act, file editing, terminal access |
| Enforce coding standards on PRs | Continue | Source-controlled checks as GitHub status checks on every PR |
| AI autocomplete in editor | Neither (use Copilot, Cursor, or Supermaven) | Both tools focus on agentic work, not inline completions |
| Autonomous multi-file changes | Cline | Plan/Act modes with checkpoints and rollback |
| Browser testing and automation | Cline | Built-in browser control, remote browser support |
| Team-wide code quality gates | Continue | Markdown-defined checks enforced in CI |
| JetBrains IDE support | Continue | Cline is VS Code only; Continue supports both |
| MCP tool ecosystem | Cline | 100+ MCP servers in marketplace |
| Privacy / local models | Either | Both support Ollama, self-hosted models, and local execution |
Using Cline and Continue Together
Since these tools now serve different purposes, they pair well. Cline handles the coding. Continue enforces quality after the code is pushed.
Combined Workflow
# Step 1: Use Cline to write code
# In VS Code, ask Cline to implement a feature
# Plan mode → review strategy → Act mode → code written
# Step 2: Push to GitHub
git push origin feature/new-auth
# Step 3: Continue runs automatically on the PR
# .continue/checks/security-review.md → GitHub status check
# .continue/checks/style-guide.md → GitHub status check
# .continue/checks/test-coverage.md → GitHub status check
# Result: Cline's code gets reviewed by Continue's AI checks
# Both tools are open-source. Both use your own API keys.This workflow gives you the best of both: autonomous coding speed from Cline, plus automated quality enforcement from Continue. Neither tool conflicts with the other because they operate at different stages of the development lifecycle.
For a broader look at AI coding options, see our guides on Cursor alternatives, GitHub Copilot alternatives, and Cline vs Cursor.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Cline or Continue better for AI coding in 2026?
For AI-assisted coding in your editor, Cline is the better choice. It's an autonomous coding agent with Plan/Act modes, browser automation, MCP integration, and 5M+ installs. Continue pivoted to a CI-first code enforcement platform. The IDE extension still works, but Continue's core product is now automated PR checks.
Is Cline free?
The VS Code extension is free and open-source. You bring your own API key and pay the model provider directly. Cline's team features (Open Source Teams) are free through Q1 2026, then $20/month with the first 10 seats always free. Enterprise pricing is custom.
What happened to Continue.dev?
Continue pivoted in mid-2025 from an IDE autocomplete/chat extension to a CLI-first platform for source-controlled AI code checks. Each check is a markdown file in .continue/checks/ that runs as a GitHub status check on PRs. The VS Code and JetBrains extensions still exist, but the company's focus shifted to CI/CD enforcement.
Can I use Cline and Continue together?
Yes. They complement each other well since they serve different purposes. Use Cline for autonomous coding in your editor. Use Continue's CLI to enforce team standards on every PR. Cline writes the code; Continue checks it.
Does Continue still work as a VS Code extension?
Yes. Continue's VS Code and JetBrains extensions still offer autocomplete, chat, and agent mode. But the company's primary product is now the Continue CLI for CI-enforceable code checks. The IDE extension receives less investment than the CLI product since mid-2025.
Better Code Search for Any AI Coding Agent
WarpGrep is an agentic code search tool that improves any AI coding agent's performance. It works as an MCP server inside Cline, Claude Code, Cursor, and any tool that supports MCP. Better search means better context means better code.